Kansloos bleken ze niet (verre van!); ze pakten direct het thuisvoordeel af, en toen ook nog Chris Bosch geblesseerd raakte leek het een kwestie van tijd om de Pacers de Finale van het Oosten te zien halen. Maar juist die positie van 'Rug tegen de Muur' bleek Miami goed te doen, en de rol van favoriet deed het omgekeerde met Indiana. Miami vocht terug, en de Pacers verkrampten. Hieronder een analyse van SI van Game-5:
Soft or not, Pacers’ biggest problem is solving Heat’s defense
After Miami’s bloody, violent smackdown of Indiana in Game 5 of the Eastern Conference semifinals on Tuesday, Pacers president Larry Bird (and, also, just Larry Bird) told the Indianapolis Star that his team was “soft”:
“I can’t believe my team went soft,” Bird said on the phone. “S-O-F-T. I’m disappointed. I never thought it would happen.”
When asked to elaborate on those comments, an obviously frustrated Bird said, “That’s all I have to say.”
Bird is playing mind games here, just as he was during the legendary 1984 NBA Finals, when he called his Celtics teammates “sissies” after the Lakers ran Boston out of the building in a Game 3 blowout. In Game 4, the Celtics’ Kevin McHale nearly decapitated the Lakers’ Kurt Rambis, Boston scratched out an overtime win and Bird’s public rebuke now stands as one of those mysterious “turning points” of a classic NBA series.
Bird is right that the Heat outrebounded Indiana 49-35, a gap that overstates things a bit, because Indiana missed 59 shots and gave Miami a huge number of chances to snag high-percentage defensive rebounds. The Pacers also lost the flagrant foul count 2-1, on all three judges’ scorecards, and they shot a disturbing 10-of-30 from within 8 feet, according to NBA.com. Those missed close shots, including a few “soft” finishes by center Roy Hibbert, resulted in several run-outs and bundles of the chaotic fast-break points that fuel Miami’s attack when its half-court offense goes through bouts of stagnancy, as it did on Tuesday.
But with all due to respect to Larry Legend, when I watched Game 5 and reviewed pieces of it on Wednesday, I did not see a team undone by physically “soft” play. I saw a team that just has not been able to figure out the Heat’s fast, swarming defense. I saw a team that hasn’t been quite good enough to take advantage of the fleeting gaps that open up amid Miami’s frantic trapping and rotations. The Pacers have scored 97.1 points per 100 possessions in the first five games of the second round, according to Hoopdata, a number that would have ranked 29th in the regular season. That is a huge fall for a top-10 offense that improved dramatically as the season progressed. The decline is a result of both Miami’s defensive excellence and, to be frank, the fact that Indiana just might not have the talent to score enough in this series, which continues Thursday with the Pacers trying to avoid elimination at home in Game 6.
Here are two possessions from Tuesday that are emblematic of Indiana’s problems. The first comes from the end of the first half, when Miami began its game-changing run. It’s a simple George Hill/David West pick-and-roll, the kind of play where the Pacers use passing rather than dribble penetration to get into the teeth of a defense and force rotations: The Heat, as they almost always do against pick-and-rolls, trap the ball-handler, leaving West open to roll to the rim. This is one way Indiana must hurt Miami, those times when one of its big men makes the catch and has a chance to scan a scrambling defense trying to guard four Pacers with just three defenders. Here’s the situation when West makes his catch and turns to face the basket near the left elbow:
For the Pacers to succeed here, West has to make a pass immediately. Holding the ball is usually fatal, as it is on this LeBron James steal. But what is West supposed to do? He’s not an elite passer, though he’s a good one, and a skip pass to Jones is risky, given that West is on his heels and James is playing free safety on the weak side. And even if the pass does get to Jones, Wade is super-fast and would be able to scramble back in time to contest any shot attempt.
Pacers guard Leandro Barbosa should ideally be an option here, but he has curled out toward half-court for reasons clear only to him. This is great defense and overwhelming talent against imperfect spacing and decent talent.
Ditto for this similar play involving Pacers power forward Tyler Hansbrough in the fourth quarter:
Why does Hansbrough fail here? For one, Miami’s defense, again, is quite terrifying. Two fast big men, Anthony and Udonis Haslem (who was suspended for Game 6 for a flagrant foul on Hansbrough), are converging on him at high speed. Wade, one of the best athletes in the league, is lurking behind Hibbert again.
But Hansbrough also isn’t much of a passer, and it takes elite skills and confidence to make this kind of pass immediately. Hansbrough had 30 assists the entire season. Also a slight problem: Point guard Darren Collison and Barbosa are fairly close to each other on the perimeter, and Collison is inside the three-point line. The spacing is less than perfect, making it easier for one Heat player to defend multiple Pacers. It also makes any potential rotations shorter, in terms of distance.
Is it possible the Pacers just don’t the horses to score on quick-hitting, intricate stuff like this? That Miami’s talent/speed advantage is just overwhelming?
Maybe. But the Pacers can surely do some things better to loosen up the offense. West can overpower Shane Battier, and though he has missed 13 of his last 21 shots, most of them have been decent looks, and more are bound to fall. Getting the ball to Hibbert in the post more is a must, though Miami has made this tough by fronting him and having help ready to contend with any lob pass. The Pacers’ coaching staff needs to figure out ways to get Hibbert a half-dozen more post-up chances, whether via cross screens under the hoop from West or Danny Granger (who is expected to play in Game 6 despite a sprained ankle), clearing lanes for those lob passes or having Hibbert duck into post position on those West pick-and-rolls. Frank Vogel is a good coach with a smart staff, and they will surely figure out other tricks.
A few other things I liked from Indiana’s offense in Game 5 — things that might deserve a second look in Game 6:
• Hibbert as the roll man in pick-and-rolls.
Indiana has been doing quite a bit of this throughout the series. Though the results have been hit-or-miss whether Hibbert tries to score or pass in the manner West attempted above, using Hibbert in this way has potential for one big reason: If Miami is playing small, with James at power forward and typically guarding a shooter, bringing Hibbert’s defender out against a pick-and-roll takes Miami’s only true big man out of the paint. Hibbert should be able to finish more plays like this, if he goes up strong and keeps his composure:Indiana also had a lot of success running the offense through Hibbert at the elbow in Game 3, something it didn’t do much of on Tuesday.
• Run through those progressions.
It sounds simple, but if option No. 1 fails, be prepared right way to go to the second option and beyond. Here’s Collison, a consistent bench spark for most of these playoffs, calling for a Granger screen after the initial West pick-and-roll fails:Collison is able to turn the corner, and the result is a decent look for Hansbrough. Granger has long been an effective screener in pick-and-rolls, so this is a nice counter.
So is this:This play has two things: 1. Hibbert facilitating from above the elbow, something that has been effective in stretches; 2. An interesting little way to use Battier’s fronting of West against the Pacers. The play starts with Battier fronting West at the left elbow, and rather than try to force-feed things there, the Pacers have West simply slide sideways and serve as a screener for Granger as Granger curls toward the top of the arc.
Granger doesn’t get a great look here, but it’s nice playmaking from the Pacers. It’s clear now that they are going to have to stretch the playbook to beat this Miami defense, and to act with decisiveness in general. That is much, much easier said than done against one of the league’s best defenses.
Links naar NBA-clips van Game-6Het was een mooie serie!
Posts
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten